THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AREL IN ARGUMENT ON ASIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SYSTEM AT ENGLISH DEBATE CLUB OF SMK PGRI 2 KEDIRI


Author (Penulis)

CINDY CALISTA
Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Author Identity (NPM)

14.1.01.08.0130

Abstract

In a debate, debaters should be able to deliver ideas structurally and convincingly as the goals of a debate by using good argument traits which are Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, and Link Back (AREL). Nonetheless, SMK PGRI 2 Kediri is being one of vocational school in Kediri which has a debate club and actively joins the competitions starting from regional until national level. This research is aimed to find out the strategies used by the debaters to build an argument and to describe the implementation of AREL in argument on Asian Parliamentary debate system at English debate club of SMK PGRI 2 Kediri. This research use qualitative approach and case study is the research design. The subject of this research was six member of English debate club. To collect the data used observation, interview, and document analysis. The instruments used were observation-check list and video recording. Transcriptions from observation and interview then was made as the document analysis. The data was analyzed using familiarizing and organizing, coding and reducing, and interpreting and representing. The result indicates that the debaters already had applied four strategies, such as understanding the issues of the debate by predicting the motion, knowing their structure of their speech based on the role of the speaker and each duty, having time allocation by giving some points on their written speech, and also keeping their team consistency by having good communication among their teammate. Regarding their AREL traits, it was implemented by most debaters of SMK PGRI 2 Kota Kediri. Only some speakers provided A-R traits or even A-R-L and A-R-E. The Deputy Prime Minister and Deputy Leader of Opposition even used multi-layered argument in their speeches.


Keyword

AREL, Argument, Debate, Asian Parliamentary Debate

Reference

Agustina, L. and Bahrani. (2016). The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debating in Mulawarman Debate Society (MDS). Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics. Vol. 1 No. 1, 2016.

Ary, D., et al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.       

Burek, D. and C. Losos (2014). "Debate: Where Speaking and Listening Come First." Voices from the Middle 22 Number 1: 9.

Cirlin, A. (1994). Academic Debate and Program Development for Students and Teachers Around The World. USA: Isocratic Press.

Daniswara, L. D. (2018). An Analysis of Written and Spoken Argument of Asian Parliamentary Debate Simulation in English Federation of Smanisda (EFoS). RETAIN. Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018, 257-264.

Meany, J. and K. Shuster (2003). On That Point! An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate. New York: International Debate Education Association.

Rahmawati, A. and A. N Syafiq. (2017). Improving Speaking Skill Through British Parliamentary Debate by Using “AREL” for Nursing Student. The 6th University Research Colloquium 2017, ISSN 2407-9189, Page 315-322.

Syarifah, M. (2016). Metode Pembelajaran Debat. https:// www. msyarifah.my.id/ model-pembelajaran-debat/

Team, J. (2014). Handbook for Competitive Debating: Asian Parliamentary Format, Jogja Debating Forum.

 


PUBLISHED

2019-02-19

JOURNAL

Simki-Pedagogia

ISSN

2599-073X

ISSUE

Vol. 03 No. 01 Tahun 2019

Download PDF

Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UN PGRI Kediri.

Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan 76 Mojoroto Kota Kediri

Designed by BootstrapMade