Learner need to acquire four english skills so that they will not miss communicate in written and spoken language. one of them is reading skill which belongs to receptive skill. in reading, the learner is demanded to obtain the meaning and comprehend or understanding the meaning of the text. in fact, the learner are hard to recognize the structure of the text and find out main idea, supporting sentence, implicite and explicite meaning, and infering the text. those difficulties is an obstacle for their reading comprehension. Because of the obstacle they face their score is getting low. The probem that they have can be solved use REAP strategy. it consist of four step as following, Read, the learner read the text, next is encode, the learner write difficult vocabulary and main idea using their own word, and then annotation, the learner summarize and answer the quation in REAP form. Then the last is ponder, the learner should work with their friend to check their writing result whether it is in line with the original text or not. This research is aim to find out whether any effect of REAP strategy to student’s reading comprehension. The study found out that post test’s score is higher than the pre test’s score. it is also supported by the data in spss that t-test (-15.931) is lower than t-table (2080) significant 5%. It proved that REAP strategy affect the tenth eleventh grade students’ reading comprehension at SMKN 1 Ngasem Kab. Kediri in the academic year 2018/2019.
Clark, Sarah Kartchner. 2013. Writing Strategies For Science. Huntington: Shell Education
Best, John W And Kahn, James V. 2006. Research In Education. Boston: PearsonEducation
Dr. Patel, M. F And Jain Praveen M. 2008. English Language Teaching Tools,Methode, And Technique. Jaipur: Sunrise Publiser
Brown, Douglas H. 2004. Language Assessment. Pearson Education: New York
Nation, I. S. P. 2009. Teaching ESL/EFL Reading And Writing. New York: Routledge
Ary, Donald. Jacobs, C. L. Sorensen, Crish. Razavieh, Asghar. 2010. Researchh In Education. Canada: Nelson Education
Sadoski, Mark. 2004. Conceptual Foundation Of Teaching Reading. New York: The Guilford.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How To Reach English. Essex: Pearson Education
Harris, Keren R And Graham, Steve. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension To Students With Learning Difficulties. New York: Guilford Press.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: Mc-Graw Hill
Sejnost, Roberta L And Thiese, Sharon M. 2010. Building Content Literacy: Strategies For The Adolescent Learner. Corwin Sage Company
Grabe, William And Stollen Fredricka L. Teaching And Researching Reading. 2002. New York: Perason Education
Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. 2017. Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran SMA/SMK/MA. Jakarta
Muaka, Angaluki Pang Elizabeth S., Bernbardt, Elizzabeth B., And KamilMichael L.2003. Teaching Reading. Switzerland: Publication Unit.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Teaching By Principle An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman
Chair And Snow, Catherine. 2002. Reading For Understanding. Santa Monica: Rand
Mcnamara, Danielle S. 2007. Reading Comprehension Strategies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kasim, Usman And Raisha, Siti. 2017. EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension Problem: Linguistic And Non-Linguistic Complexities. English Education Journal.
Davoudi, Muhammad. 2015. Comprehension Breakdown : A Review Of Research OnEFL Learners’ Reading Difficulty And Problem. International Journal Of Language And Applied Linguistics
Zasrianita, Fera. 2016. Using Of Reading, Encoding, Annotating, And Pondering (Reap) Technique To Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension. Ta’dib.
Tiruneh, Dawit Tibube. 2014. The Effect Of Explicit Reading Strategy Instruction OnReading Comprehension Of Upper Primary Grade Students.International Journal Of Education.