THE EFFECT OF WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TO THE STUDENTS\' WRITING ABILITY AT SMK PAWYATAN DAHA 1 KEDIRI
Author (Penulis)
ANA YUNITASARIUniversitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
Author Identity (NPM)
14.1.01.08.0048Abstract
There are some problems faced by the students in learning English especially writing. The problems are they do not have writing habit so they were still confused to write. These problems come from the aspects of writing those are content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. When they write some sentences, many grammatical errors are found in their writing product. One of the solving problems is Written Corrective Feedback. From this way, the students can know their error and they can revise it by doing the instruction from their teacher. Then, the purpose of this research is to find out the effects of written corrective feedback to the students’ writing ability at SMK Pawyatan Daha 1 Kediri. This research uses experimental research and quantitative approach with one group pre-test and post-test design. The 400 students of the tenth grade become the population and 36 students from X AKL 2 were chosen as the sample. The data was analyzed using Paired Sample T-Test. The result of data analysis shows that the mean score of the pre-test and post-test increase from 43.333 to 77.7778, the t-test (18.397) > t-table (2.021) and significance value (0,000) < 0.05. From those results, it can be concluded that Written Corrective Feedback gives significant effects to the students’ writing ability at SMK Pawyatan Daha 1 Kediri. Finally, this strategy helps students to be interested in learning writing and motivated to master every aspect in learning writing.
Keyword
aReference
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ary, Donald., Jacobs, Lucy Cheser., Sorensen, Christine K. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education Eight Edition. Belmont: Wadswort.
Bitchener J & Ferris D.R.2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R.2009. A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT Journal 63(2) :97-107.
Ferris. Dana R. 2011. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. USA. University of Michigan.
Hyland, K; Hyland, F. 2006. Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Johnson. Andrew P. 2008. Teaching Reading and Writing. United States of America. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Knapp, Peter & Watkins, Megan. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies For Teaching And Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching (1st edition). New York: McGrawHill/Contemporary.
Permendikbud nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kurikulum 2013.
Richards, J.C & Renandya, W.A. 2002. Methodolody in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sufyan, Agus. 2015. Improving Students’ Discussion Text Writing Skill Through Teacher Indirect Feedback Technique. Department of English Education Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers’ Training Syarif Hidayatulloh State University Jakarta.
Sowton, Chris.2011. 50 Steps to Improve Your Academic Writing. Garnet Education.
Utami, Uli Tri. 2012. Improving Students’ Writing Skill Through Teacher’s Direct Feedback in SMA N 1 Jogonalan.
